Pemanfaatan Generative Artificial Intelligence sebagai Scaffolding Metakognitif dalam Pendidikan: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis

Authors

  • I Kadek Agus Pratistha Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Ketut Agustini Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Kadek Suartama Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Made Tegeh Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.4974

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, metacognitive scaffolding, self-regulated learning, systematic literature review, pendidikan

Abstract

Perkembangan Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) telah membuka peluang baru dalam mendukung pembelajaran melalui penyediaan scaffolding yang adaptif dan personal. Salah satu pendekatan yang semakin banyak dikaji adalah pemanfaatan GenAI sebagai metacognitive scaffolding untuk membantu peserta didik dalam merencanakan, memantau, dan mengevaluasi proses belajarnya. Meskipun penelitian mengenai Generative AI dalam pendidikan berkembang sangat pesat, kajian yang secara khusus mensintesis perannya sebagai scaffolding metakognitif masih terbatas dan tersebar pada berbagai konteks pembelajaran sehingga belum memberikan gambaran yang utuh mengenai pola implementasi, manfaat, dan tantangannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mensintesis temuan empiris mengenai peran, manfaat, tantangan, dan arah pengembangan Generative AI sebagai metacognitive scaffolding dalam pendidikan. Penelitian menggunakan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan mengacu pada pedoman PRISMA 2020. Artikel diperoleh dari basis data Scopus menggunakan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi yang telah ditetapkan. Dari proses seleksi diperoleh 19 artikel yang memenuhi kriteria untuk dianalisis. Hasil sintesis menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar penelitian melaporkan GenAI mendukung tiga dimensi utama metakognisi, yaitu planning, monitoring, dan reflection, melalui pemberian umpan balik adaptif, prompting reflektif, serta personalisasi pembelajaran yang berkontribusi terhadap peningkatan self-regulated learning, berpikir kritis, dan keterlibatan belajar. Namun demikian, implementasi GenAI juga menghadapi sejumlah tantangan, antara lain cognitive offloading, ketergantungan terhadap AI, integritas akademik, bias algoritma, privasi data, dan literasi digital. Oleh karena itu, efektivitas GenAI sangat bergantung pada desain pedagogis yang mengintegrasikan strategi metacognitive scaffolding dengan peran aktif pendidik. Kontribusi penelitian ini terletak pada penyajian sintesis konseptual mengenai mekanisme Generative AI sebagai scaffolding metakognitif sekaligus mengidentifikasi peluang penelitian lanjutan untuk pengembangan model implementasi yang lebih efektif dan bertanggung jawab.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bozorgian, H., & Rahimi, H. (2025). Peer e-Feedback and ChatGPT-4o in EFL Writing: A Cognitive-Interpersonal Comparison Based on EFL Students. Journal of Language and Education, 11(4), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.27195

Campos, M. (2025). AI-assisted feedback in CLIL courses as a self-regulated language learning mechanism: students’ perceptions and experiences. European Public and Social Innovation Review, 10. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1568

Chakraborty, R., & Singh, P. P. (2025). Development of Science Delay of Gratification Scale (SDOGS): Novel Amalgamation of Automated Item Generation, Genetic Algorithm, Nash equilibrium and Network Approaches in Psychometrics. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 14(3), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.14419/tex0pd96

Gomez-Jaramillo, S., Cardona-Zapata, O., Valbuena-Henao, M., & Poliche, V. (2025). Guided Learning with AI: A Didactic Strategy Using Sequential Tutoring via ChatGPT for Object-Oriented Programming. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(7), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.7.35

Hong, H. (2025). Enhancing Critical Thinking: Interactive Cognitive Offload Instruction with Generative AI in English Essay Writing. Proceedings of 2025 International Conference on AI-Enabled Education, AIEE 2025, 07(07), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/3768421.3768447

Hong, H., Vate-U-lan, P., & Viriyavejakul, C. (2025). Generative AI–mediated scaffolds for enhanced critical thinking in EFL writing. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(6), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i6.7751

Jin, F. J. Y., Maheshi, B., Lai, W., Li, Y., Gasevic, D., Chen, G., Charwat, N., Chan, P. W. K., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Gašević, D., & Tsai, Y. S. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Generative AI–Powered Learning Analytics in the Feedback Process: A Feedback Literacy Perspective. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2025.8609

Ky, M., & Lian, A. (2025). A comparative analysis of academic literacy support models: Impacts on self-regulated learning (SRL) for an international student in Australia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.10486

Lee, H. Y., Chen, P. H., Wang, W. S., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, T. T. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4

Li, L., & Kim, M. (2024). It is like a friend to me: Critical usage of automated feedback systems by self-regulating English learners in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8821

Li, Z. (2025). Bridging pedagogy and technology: a generative AI and IoT approach to transformative English language education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06151-6

Lim, L. A., Ainscough, L., Deneen, C., Pacitti, H., Taylor-Griffiths, D., Male, S. A., & Frankland, S. (2025). Transition Pedagogy in the Age of AI: The Role of Self-Regulated Learning. Student Success, 16(3 Special Issue), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.63608/ssj.3766

Lu, G., Ba, S., & Yang, L. (2025). Optimizing GAI-assisted formative feedback: an experimental study on its effects on engagement, shared metacognition, and learning performance in online collaborative learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25937–25967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13778-0

McPhee, S. W., & Jerowsky, M. (2025). Beyond technical skills: a pedagogical perspective on fostering critical engagement with generative AI in university classrooms. Frontiers in Education, 10(September), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1593278

Picardal, M. T. (2025). Utilization of AI-Driven Smart Prompts in Academic Research in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(9), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.9.19

Taylor, P. R., & Marino, M. C. (2024). On feedback from bots: Intelligence tests and teaching writing. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.2.22

Tomisu, H., Ueda, J., & Yamanaka, T. (2025). The cognitive mirror: a framework for AI-powered metacognition and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Education, 10(October), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1697554

Wu, X. Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). Integrating learner characteristics and generative AI affordances to enhance self-regulated learning: a configurational analysis. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44322-025-00028-x

Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024). L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y

Downloads

Published

2026-08-06

How to Cite

Pratistha, I. K. A. ., Agustini, K. ., Suartama, I. K. ., & Tegeh, I. M. . (2026). Pemanfaatan Generative Artificial Intelligence sebagai Scaffolding Metakognitif dalam Pendidikan: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 15(3 Agustus), 3233-3246. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.4974