Efektivitas Model Blended Learning Berbasis Guided Inquiry dalam Pembelajaran IPA terhadap Self-Regulated Learning Murid Sekolah Menengah Pertama: Systematic Literature Review

Ida Ayu Intan Nandini; I Wayan Santyasa; Ni Nyoman  Parwati

doi:10.58230/27454312.5107

Authors

Ida Ayu Intan Nandini Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
I Wayan Santyasa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Ni Nyoman Parwati Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.5107

Keywords:

blended learning, guided inquiry, self-regulated learning, pembelajaran IPA, SMP

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) merupakan kemampuan esensial dalam pembelajaran IPA abad ke-21, terutama dalam lingkungan blended learning. Kajian ini bertujuan mensintesis bukti empiris mengenai efektivitas blended learning berbasis guided inquiry terhadap SRL murid SMP. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dilakukan mengikuti pedoman PRISMA 2020 dengan kerangka PICOS: murid SMP (P), blended learning berbasis guided inquiry (I), pembelajaran konvensional/alternatif (C), SRL (O), dan desain eksperimen/kuasi-eksperimen (S). Pencarian dilakukan pada basis data POP (n=45), ERIC (n=38), Google Scholar (n=82), dan Garuda (n=35) pada rentang 2021–2026, dengan pencarian terakhir 15 Januari 2026. Dari 200 rekaman yang teridentifikasi, 30 duplikat dihapus, 130 rekaman dieksklusi berdasarkan judul/abstrak, dan 35 artikel dinilai kelayakannya. Hanya dua studi yang secara langsung mengukur SRL; keduanya tidak menguji integrasi blended learning + guided inquiry secara bersamaan. Studi lainnya (n=8) merupakan bukti kontekstual yang mengukur hasil belajar, literasi sains, metakognisi, atau engagement. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa bukti langsung mengenai efektivitas blended learning berbasis guided inquiry terhadap SRL murid SMP masih sangat terbatas. Guided inquiry tidak secara otomatis meningkatkan SRL (p = 0,078), dan dukungan metakognitif eksplisit (misalnya metacognitive prompts dan video modeling) berperan penting dalam menjembatani aktivitas inquiry dengan regulasi diri. Kajian ini menyimpulkan bahwa klaim efektivitas terhadap SRL belum dapat ditegakkan; diperlukan penelitian primer yang secara khusus menguji intervensi gabungan dengan pengukuran SRL yang valid dan reliabel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aquino, G. J. V., Camarao, M. K. G., & Domaoal, F. A. D. (2025). Impact of blended learning approach on students’ metacognition and academic achievement in science: A meta-analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Teacher Education & Teaching, 5(1).

Arvatz, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2025). Science and mathematics high school students’ perceptions of self-regulated learning: Arvatz & Dori. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(5), 1467–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10516-9

Arvatz, A., Peretz, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2025). Self-regulated learning and reflection: A tool for teachers and students: Arvatz et al. Metacognition and Learning, 20(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09415-3

Ateş, H. (2024). Designing a self-regulated flipped learning approach to promote students’ science learning performance. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202401_27(1).RP05

Dama, L., & Nurrijal, N. (2023). Blended learning strategies through guided inquiry learning settings to increase learning acquisition of concepts and procedures in biology subjects. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 16(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.28542

Eugenijus, L. (2023). Integrating blended learning and STEM education: Innovative approaches to promote interdisciplinary learning. Research and Advances in Education, 2(9), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.56397/RAE.2023.09.03

Gunawan, G., Jufri, A. W., Nisrina, N., Al-Idrus, A., Ramdani, A., & Harjono, A. (2021). Guided inquiry blended learning tools (GI-BL) for school magnetic matter in junior high school to improve students’ scientific literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1747(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012034

Gürbüz, F., & Kahveci, I. (2025). Investigating the impact of blended learning approach on grade 7 science achievement. Anadolu Dil ve Eğitim Dergisi, 3(2), 149–164.

Hanč, J., Borovský, D., & Hančová, M. (2024). Blended learning: A data-literate science teacher is a better teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2715(1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2715/1/012012

Hapsari, A., & Fatmasari, T. A. (2022). Online self-regulated learning strategies in the process of writing undergraduate thesis: A survey study. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 8(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v8i2.24333

Hidayat, C. S., Wahyuni, S., Astuti, S. R. D., & Barid, S. S. A. Q. (2026). Effect of guided inquiry on the development of critical thinking in science learning in junior high school students: A review. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 21(1), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v21i1.10904

Karaca, M., Bektas, O., & T. Celikkiran, A. (2023). An examination of the self-regulation for science learning of middle school students with different achievement levels. Psychology in the Schools, 60(3), 511–540. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22776

Lobos, K., Cobo-Rendón, R., Bruna Jofré, D., & Santana, J. (2024). New challenges for higher education: Self-regulated learning in blended learning contexts. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1457367. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1457367

Mastuang, M., Misbah, M., Arlinda, R., Muhammad, N., Harto, M., Qamariah, Q., & Murshed, M. B. (2025). Trends and research patterns of blended learning in science education: A VOSviewer-based bibliometric analysis. Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education, 3(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.62672/joease.v3i4.67

Meng, F., & Jumaat, N. F. B. (2024). The effectiveness of an online inquiry-based learning environment towards secondary school students’ behavioral engagement and performance in science. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(18), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i18.50547

Nggadung, W., Wedi, A., & Utami, D. D. (2026). The effect of guided inquiry learning with virtual laboratory on junior high school students’ physics learning outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, 12(1), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v12i1.10980

Omarchevska, Y., Lachner, A., Richter, J., & Scheiter, K. (2022). Do video modeling and metacognitive prompts improve self-regulated scientific inquiry? Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 1025–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09652-3

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Sarala, A., & Sasikala, J. M. (2026). Effect of blended learning strategy on achievement in biology of students at secondary level. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 52(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2026/v52i42963

Yusof, S. A., & Arsad, N. M. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning in science education: A systematic review. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.15.05.2025.p16120